Title:
SUSTAINABILITY THOUGHTS 146: WHICH ARE THE PARADIGM EVOLUTIONS ROUTES AVAILABLE IN THE CASE PERFECT CAPITALISM IS BROUGHT DOWN BY BINDING SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY GAP PRESSURES? WHAT IS THE NATURE OF THE MARKET STRUCTURE ASSOCIATED WITH EACH OF THOSE ROUTES?

Authors:
Lucio Munoz ,Canada

Abstract:
Markets that expand continuously under externality neutrality assumptions reach sooner or later a point of possible collapse when the assumptions turns out to be wrong as suddenly the threat that was assumed away at the beginning now becomes a binding current threat to the survival of the market, and this is true if we are dealing with environmental externality neutrality assumptions or with social externality neutrality assumption or with socio-environmental externality neutrality assumptions. When the market is under a binding threat, it can be saved if we take action to fix the relevant binding externality problem affecting it or it can be patched. If on the other hand, stakeholders failed to act to save it, the market will collapse and flip to inverse opposite models, perfectly or imperfectly or it will flip towards authoritarianism. The above holds true for any market including the traditional market, in this case the traditional market under binding social externality threats. This paper focuses on the social externality threat incrusted in the perfect traditional market model due to the social externality neutrality assumption; and the failure to fix it or patch it to prevent the perfect traditional market model collapse when under binding social externality threat. And this raises the questions, which are the paradigm evolutions routes available in the case perfect capitalism is brought down by binding social sustainability gap pressures? What is the nature of the market structure associated with each of those routes? Among the goals of this paper is to provide answers to these questions.