|
Title: THE POLITICS OF MILITARY WITHDRAWAL IN GOVERNANCE: THE NIGERIAN
EXPERIENCE |
Authors: Chijioke Basil Onuoha,Ebong, Itoro Bassey,Osezua Ozinegbe and Uno, Etim Uno ,Nigeria |
Abstract: Literature on politics of military intervention and transition programmes in Nigeria have
attracted several attentions by different writers. The traditional role of the military is to ensure
territorial protection against internal and external aggression not governance. Most African
countries have experienced long military involvement in nation’s politics. This has threatened
their democracy due to the dictatorial and autocratic nature of military leadership styles. In
Nigeria, immediately after independence in 1960, the country has witnessed series of military
coup and counter coup. Several military regimes came up with the transition programmes on
how to transit power to the civilian elected government. However, the reverse has been the case
as the process was politicized to ensure their continued stay in office. This action triggered
several coup which threatened the country’s already weaken democratic system. The objective of
this paper is to appraise several military intervention and the politics of military transition
programmes in Nigeria. To achieve the objective of this study, the paper adopted historical and
descriptive research method and data were drawn with the aid of secondary and primary sources.
Army Personal and corporate interest theory was adopted as a theoretical framework. The major
findings of the study revealed among others; that the problem of underdevelopment and political
instability in Nigeria today results from long term military involvement in the nation’s politics
(ii) that the Nigeria Military organization has been bedeviled by the politics of prebendalism and
ethnicity which in turned influence their constitutional roles and responsibilities. Available
evidence portrays that the politicization of the military transition programmes in Nigeria has
paved way for subsequent counter military coup. Based on the above findings, the paper
recommended that (i) Civilian political class should disengaged from corrupt practices and
extolling the ethos of good governance in order to avoid subsequent military coup as this is
always been the case while military struck (ii) all elected and appointed officials in whatever
capacity should provide good leadership. This is because the most potent weapon against
military intervention in politics is good governance |
PDF Download |
|
|